Glenn Dittmann

Sure ```rust let a = Vector4::new(6.8, 8.9, 5.0, 0.0); let b = Vector4::new(2.0, 8.7, 3.9, 0.0); let c = Vector4::new(7.9, 5.7, 1.8, 0.0); let d = Vector4::new(0.0, 100000.0, -100000.0, 0.0);...

Hi, @JulianKnodt, thanks for your reply, interesting indeed! Of course I am considering instability of numerical computations when comparing floating point values. I just saw this and was curios. I...

@JulianKnodt wow thanks for going the extra mile. Interesting also that `wolfram alpha` has basically the same result as `nalgebra`. From theory it should still be `0.0`. Should we close...

I am just setting up both `maple` and `mathematica` on my machine. Will update this comment later with results. Edit: maple is computing `det = 0.` mathematica is computing `det...

Hmm.. `.determinant()` has some traits that are not satifified by `Rational64` out of the box. Otherwise, thanks for the input, will maybe try again in the future.

@redxaxder Thanks ! I wanted to point this out as well. @Andlon Yes, I see you're point here. However I think IF there is a reasonable efficient technique, that can...

@pythagorean Thanks ! Can confirm it worked. I think this should be added to the wasm-book.

As this was closed with #1197: can we now use `x: {tickFormat: "%b\n?%Y"}` as proposed above? I am doing this right now, but the formatting stays the same as without...

Thanks for the quick reply! For now I am fine with as it is now, thanks anyways. :)

Hi, I am currently doing it for my thesis in computer graphics. Would be happy to open source my code after submitting / have it be integrated with `spade` /...