Gary Casey
Gary Casey
Have added @cconstab and @XavierChanth as reviewers as I'd like this change to have more eyes on it before we merge it
@sitaram-kalluri - can you add tests for these scenarios please: - Namespace hierarchies on enrolling side - Approving app has permission for "my_app" and "__manage" - Enrolling app is requesting...
One more scenario - approver has access to "buzz" - enroller requests access to "fizzbuzz" - approver can not approve - enroller requests access to "fizz.buzz" - approver can approve
@sitaram-kalluri LGTM; please can you run the NoPorts e2e tests locally against this at_server branch just to verify that everything is OK? To run NoPorts e2e tests locally: * ensure...
@VJag quick notes re integrating with APKAM enrollment flow - Use passkey for APKAM keypair - Fetch public encryption key of the atSign - Create a symmetric aes key and...
@sitaram-kalluri @srieteja https://github.com/atsign-foundation/at_server/issues/2045 has been resolved - let's unskip the test and get this PR reviewed and merged
@cpswan [here](https://github.com/atsign-foundation/at_libraries/actions/runs/9273895167/job/25514991460?pr=588) you will see the test that I added failing, but still the overall check succeeds
Issue resolved by #611
@srieteja @sitaram-kalluri This PR is very old. Should we close it, and re-prioritize atsign-foundation/at_client_sdk#1563 ? There was a lot of work here, it's not clear to me why it was...
@srieteja You should stay focused on the C impl of at_activate. Please mark this as draft and add a comment to the associated ticket.