Giuseppe Natale

> C=1 was just to evaluate the boundary condition of C and under this condition the conversion rate, from my analysis (if it is correct), is out of bounds to...

> Interesting, the tragedy of the commons problem and everyone is tempted to lend their $PHOTON unsuspecting a hostile vote to increase taxes. Optimism allows for token-determined VP to vote...

that makes sense. I'll edit the first post.

@0xFDg the curve you show for C is somewhat expected. C has at the numerator a "fixed" quantity and at the denominator an exponentially increasing quantity. So it exhibits the...

> It's the other way around because going from PHOTON back to ATOM1 is potentially dangerous to governance. The README has some of this but it isn't yet decided. See...

@0xFDg > I think for avoid this problem to delegate ATOM1b (atom arriving from PHOTON) through a party hub which design an algorithm that take a decision giving different weight...

@jaekwon I mainly agree with most of everything written. I want to put emphasis to > unless the throttling mechanism from PHOTON -> ATOM1 was onerous yes. Imho it should...

> The premium could just be burned perhaps? maybe, or maybe go to $ATOM1 stakers. And/or maybe some of the $PHOTONS from the bids could also be burned if there's...

How do we address this fair comment here? https://twitter.com/0xikaruz/status/1735371296085594532?t=xzhvFZXZMZCp4AaWTzp0dw It's a compelling argument for why this might be not suitable after all. EDIT: probably rushed to a conclusion without much...

> Oh awesome @albttx, could you please send me the JSONs or whatever you have for this when you get a moment? Partially so I can build the airdrop simulation...