gitmko0
gitmko0
Will websocket be written with ants be more performant than using solutions such as gobwas or fastws With reference to go routines being used in websocket here https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/million-websockets-and-go-cc58418460bb/ and also...
For 10M tasks using only 1.3gb, can you put your server spec into front page for your benchmark? It seems to be very very good.
How much memory per goroutine pool size? Can you please put this on main page? p, _ := ants.NewPool(50000)
possible to use ants as a soft-realtime go func() like erlang? sorry i hv yet to explore this code in detail but i'm exploring options to make goroutines handle more...
1. Everything looks good on benchmark. However, do you have edge case whereby go default "net" package is more suitable for use? I've come across "problems" using speed optimized packages...
1. thanks for fastcache. I'm using victoriametrics fastcache and come across bytebufferpool, which seemed to be faster. So is there a possibility to make it so that there's a limit...
Something along the lines of this: https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/go?topic=go-fault-tolerance Is there any possibility to incorporate fasthttp into the code above or we can do one for our own use with a newer...
Also, how do you get RemoteAddr()?
any intent to make http into a full fledge http server like fasthttp?
1. possible to do benchmark with hardware spec? 2. show actual use case / production live site list 3. what is the max concurrent connection able to push with fastw?...