Christian Gill

> In an ideal world docs-ts would allow you to specify exclusions or otherwise ignore certain files or pieces of code. How do you think this discriminated enforce could be...

> It's the same reason linters et al always have opt-out directives. Makes sense! > As for implementation, as an end user, I don't really mind. Sorry, I explained my...

Yeah, I think 80 is quite the default for columns :ok_hand:

We could add the instructions to the docs on how to run locally with Jekyll. However, if we include something I'd rather go the Dockerfile way as well.

I don't have any strong opinion on this. Maybe it could be both? Or maybe as a direct dependency? :thinking:

@lvitaly I chatted with some of their advocates at [OdessaJS 2019](http://odessajs.org/2019/index.html) and they indeed used the library. They were handing out fp-ts stickers.

We are in the process of introducing fp-ts and io-ts at Catawiki (@catawiki). Some of the frontend teams already using it. No public repos. One public page: [seller feedback](https://www.catawiki.com/fulfilment/seller/3038205/feedback). -...

Awesome! Yes I think it would be great to include tests.

> that information is quite useless as it's all green. Indeed. I am up for it too.

Doesn't work for me either, tried @filoxo suggestion but still same error EDIT: Never mind, it did work. I had a typo :man_facepalming: