Jonathan

I think in practice as @mirabilos says we can assume non-text resources are inheriting the licence we have in the repo, and that they had the necessary status for inclusion...

Hi - in an effort to make the Issues a list of actionable specs for work tickets going forward, @victorypoint can you please update your request based on the discussion...

@victorypoint Just checking: is your original ticket now up to date such that it reflects what needs to be done? Not sure if additional/changed things are still scattered through the...

@gene96817 Apologies, by "ticket" I meant this issue.

@gene96817 @victorypoint Yes, it's something we've just recently being trying to sort out. Anything that needs to be substantially discussed before agreeing on an actionable specification for the work needs...

@victorypoint Yes - although ideally if you could edit [your original](https://github.com/jamulussoftware/jamulus/issues/497#issue-674637842) so that people don't need to scroll down to find what was eventually decided. I have in fact put...

@hoffie What's the reason why we'd not just say what we say today? I don't think we need to explain how we're doing the check - or am I misunderstanding?...

Also META COMMENT: Interesting use of "waiting on team" to hide the fact that this is really a discussion not an issue! Ah, project management ... :-)

> people running modified Jamulus editions So the current message might (but not always) result in them going "Huh? But I am running the latest version" or needlessly reinstalling? But...

Sorry for the stupid question - but why can't we use the version that's on GitHub?