Gabriel Hackebeil
Gabriel Hackebeil
I agree that it is worth discussing. I like the idea about allowing objects to be placed on more than one block / in more than one container. It would...
I’m not sure I understand why that needs to be accessed through an argument to the rule. It’s already available in global scope, correct? > On May 28, 2019, at...
Never mind. It depends on where the rules are defined. > On May 28, 2019, at 12:33 PM, carldlaird wrote: > > It looks like encapsulation is violated in the...
What do you mean? We've been using this for quite some time and it seems to work fine. I'm confused by the commit referenced above as well. The Appveyor tests...
Agreed. Maybe we should rename this ticket to reflect that. The problem is with output redirection, not the return code. > On Jul 6, 2016, at 4:50 PM, William Hart...
I think this is a good issue to link to the solver redesign PEP. > On May 23, 2019, at 2:31 PM, Bethany Nicholson wrote: > > This question on...
@jsiirola: I think the more important edge case to avoid is having the top container active flag False but one or more children True. I don't know if the current...
I do agree with you that it would simplify the design, and it could probably be implemented without `O(n)` expense everywhere by just having the children of containers just notify...
I'm curious why you are dropping support for 3.10 with it being more than a year out from EOL?
Thanks for the reference, @PTNobel