Guillermo González de Agüero

Does it really make sense to maintain two versions, one for Jakarta EE 8 and other for EE 9? Isn't it better to just move towards 9 with Java 11?

Makes sense. I'm keeping an eye on this repository and will try to contribute where possible.

One addition. As a user, I usually expect for a prominent Download link somewhere on the page. In this case, that's the Compatible Products menu item. Somehow we need to...

Now that JSF 2.3 is out and the old annotations are effectively deprecated, I think it's time to do the change. Also, have in mind that some JSF features now...

As I see it, it's just a matter of what JDK and JSF versions we want to support. For the JDK, I doubt anyone using BootsFaces is still bound to...

Have you taken a look at JoinFaces? It's JSF for SpringBoot and even mentions BootsFaces: https://github.com/joinfaces/joinfaces I'd also like to upgrade to Java 8 but I don't think default method...

So how does JoinFaces work if CDI beans are broken? I haven't used Spring nor Spring Boot. Not calling ServletContainerInitializers seems like an odd decision since the spec mandates Servlet...

ButterFaces link has been removed on https://github.com/TheCoder4eu/BootsFacesWeb/commit/528061790c8b50aa7294318df6ca689154075a9d Can the dependency be removed? I'm just seeking for a cleaner classpath. Also, PrimeFaces has just released 6.1. Should we update that?

@lyahim have you tried this https://jj-blogger.blogspot.com.es/2015/06/utilizing-java-8-date-time-api-with-jsf.html? It worked for me on PrimeFaces. I think BootsFaces could do some tricks to provide LocalDate and LocalDateTime converters (putting them on a separated...

@tofflos please join the Soteria and Enterprise Security mailing lists if you haven't dond already. Most discussions take place there. It will be great to have you too! El sáb.,...