Gary Ewan Park

> @FalsePhilosopher said... To diversify the choco package ecosystem with an alt repo to pull from. The slight problem here is that while Chocolatey is a package manager, and uses...

> @ferventcoder said... > Chocolatey can point to a nuspec for install, but it will compile it into a nupkg and then install it. This is probably a different flow...

Any change in this area will require an upstream change in the chocolatey.extension to ensure that any and all new logic is respected there.

A follow up spike task has been created to confirm that this functionality continues to work as expected when the Chocolatey Licensed Extension is installed: https://gitlab.com/chocolatey/collaborators/choco-licensed/-/issues/631

@TheCakeIsNaOH would you be able to break this out into a new issue: > Would be nice to include options that come in from business editions as well here. This...

@TheCakeIsNaOH This one I am not sure about. Usage of side by side installation argument is not recommended, as it causes known problems during upgrade. This one will need more...

> @TheCakeIsNaOH said... One item for discussion is whether the pin status should be included in --include-remembered-arguments, or if a separate argument (e.g. --include-pins) should be added. This is an...

@gsscoder What error did you get when trying to pin the package? I have just tried, and it worked fine for me.

There is a precedence for this type of logic during the uninstall of a package. For example, if I attempt to uninstall `notepadplusplus` I get the following:  I think...

@AdmiringWorm @TheCakeIsNaOH @pauby following discussions, I have backed out the changes that were associated with this issue in #2726 The reason for this is that integration tests began failing after...