brandon s allbery kf8nh
brandon s allbery kf8nh
> Are they valid Cabal files if there is nothing but comments? I don't think so. Pretty sure you need at minimum `name` and one target.
It looks like doctest and field syntax reference are still using cabal 3.10.3.0 (ghcup default?), whereas everything else is using 3.12.1.0.
I don't have a problem with this, but I think pretty much every interesting layout requires access to xmonad internals. I'm wondering if a better approach would be to find...
FTR, Docker Hub says this is 1.15.4, digest [28ad96092f53](https://hub.docker.com/layers/hif1/heisenbridge/latest/images/sha256-28ad96092f53b8a351dd97dc2fcca82e0a7ad92a73b40ec6eca29625db50c49c). The version issue was already reported as #287.
The question then becomes, is this the fault of cabal somehow, or is it a bug in `semaphore-compat`?
Pinging @bgamari who added this support in #9139.
(of course, it's not exactly the best time for him…)
The problem with using a logging framework is bootstrapping.
Added a dependency so Mergify will hold off until it's merged.
@Gabriella439, since you made this PR from your work account, you must rebase it manually and use the `merge+no rebase` label because neither Mergify nor we are allowed to update...