Gáspár Nagy

With "normal" runs, the System Tests execution is fine. I use NCrunch that runs the tests isolated in the background. Normally when I build, it realizes that the build output...

Thinking about this a bit more... Maybe all-in-all your optimization has more advantages than disadvantages. Maybe we could make some optimizations: - One of the problem is that when it...

Another note (independent of all the others): Two tests from the `Reqnroll.TestProjectGenerator.Tests.ProjectTests` currently fails (`CreateEmptyCSharpCore3_1ProjectInNewFormat` and `CreateEmptyCSharpNet50ProjectInNewFormat`) with `'--no-update-check' is not a valid option`. As we don't support these frameworks...

Thx for the additions. On reviving #64... this might be a good idea. Let's consider this separately. > Sadly at least windows don't allow to rename the folder when a...

@obligaron Why do you think it would need a more complex solution? What if we would just do a * `` * `` (no ContinueOnError, unless env variable is set!)...

@obligaron oh cool. i give it a try (probably only on Friday) and give feedback.

@obligaron I played with this and found funny things... It seems that in some situations Windows is able to rename the folder even with a lock on it, but then...

> And as mentioned in the SO answer, personally I think that transforming data from the SUT into a table for comparison is a bit redundant. With the `@DataTable` type...

@obligaron please check the code, especially the commit https://github.com/reqnroll/Reqnroll/pull/277/commits/d56b04fbafea3b0a609f3be4382c0b1293683c5d Basically what it does: 1. Makes the "testRunner" field instance (non static), so that it does not conflict with the different...

> It might be nice to have a test that proves steps are running concurrently (e.g. by having them all wait on a semaphore that is reduced by each parallel...