Gáspár Nagy
Gáspár Nagy
Looks interesting. We can try in an opt-in fession without too much risk... @Socolin could you please try to make a PR for this so that it is easier to...
@SabotageAndi @jrod567 The `string` -> `string` transformations are not supported with the step argument transformations. (It is not limited to numbers, but this special case is not supported.) For such...
@jrod567 I did a bit more investigation and found, that indeed, we have improved the conversion logic for `string` -> `string` conversions, but only for cases where there is no...
@SabotageAndi @lanfeust69 I have discussed this with @epresi, and I don't think it would be a good idea to make the config file configurable, because of the complications with the...
@avonwyss Thx for the good summary. In general, the trace listener interface is responsible for collecting messages (in two categories: business and technical) from the SpecFlow runtime and forward them...
@SabotageAndi i remember a related PR already... but i cant find it now (yes, it was related to the line pragmas). Someone was mentioning that he prototyped the fix with...
There was an extra unnecessary line pragma in the code....
Found it: #604 (issue #361)... needs some work still. I have a description there (https://github.com/techtalk/SpecFlow/pull/604#issuecomment-218088897) if someone wants to grab.
@lukefan6 yes, based on the date it should be included in v2.2
Hard-coded 'specflow.json' name doesn't allow different configurations for different test assemblies
@lanfeust69 Could you please give some details about which configuration settings you would like to specify in the `specflow.json` so that we can find some other suggestions? BTW: I think...