Matt Westcott

The immediate questions would be: do browsers accept SVG files in `` tags as faithfully as they would accept PNG/JPEG/GIF, and can our underlying image libraries (PIL or Imagemagick) work...

To be honest, I'd say that the image library is the wrong place for something like that. One of the core principles of Wagtail is to keep the roles of...

@tadeo The wagtailimages module is fundamentally designed around a workflow that's only relevant to raster images: an editor, who may not know or care about web constraints, uploads an image...

OK, reopening by popular demand :-) Again, I must stress that wagtailimages is built on a particular set of assumptions and a workflow designed around raster images (i.e. the idea...

> I think the thing > standing in the way, is that the templates for the add/edit forms (for > Snippets and Pages) don't ever add > enctype="multipart/form-data" to the...

Hi @kunambi, Feel free to work on it :-) With this kind of feature request, we're mostly reliant on outside contributors - members of the core team will typically only...

If we're going to support SVG interchangeably with other image formats, someone needs to write a proposal (probably as an RFC: https://github.com/wagtail/rfcs) detailing how we update the image model API...

"at least it would solve the problem well enough for the majority of use cases" - Really? That's absolutely not the impression I get from the discussion here. Multiple people...

@Adrian-Turjak It sounds like what you're proposing isn't really specific to SVG - you could equally say "I want editors to be able to upload .bmp images and have it...

> I understand that the current decision is to rasterize SVG Just to clarify, there are no plans to implement SVG through rasterising. It's clear that this approach wouldn't fit...