galileo-pkm

Yep, had to spinup a new VM for winblows ...

> Not much has changed with this release. gopls remains a memory hog. My "template" project without any real code and gopls eats up 2.2G. With a few medium size...

I took a look at your changes and applied them atop of master branch. It seems that you have included in your zip file SweepWorker.py.org file instead of your modified...

It seems that you forgot to attach the zip file :)

Unfortunately no but I think I know what is going on. You are responding to github notification email and attaching the file there. You will have to respond to the...

Great. Thanks

I have applied your changes to the master branch and published them at: https://github.com/galileo-pkm/nanovna-saver/tree/PA0JOZ if anyone else wants to test them. The test was done with a recent version of...

First bug: Load calibration from file seems to ignore the "thrurefl" points. 

It seems to a cosmetic issue only, I have updated the branch at https://github.com/galileo-pkm/nanovna-saver/tree/PA0JOZ with a fix.

> Hello, > is there any reason why this Enhanced calibration is not included in the master release of NanoVNA-Saver? Is there any drawback in using theseenhanced formulas instead of...