Gabriela Araujo Britto

@typescript-bot user test this

@typescript-bot test this @typescript-bot user test this @typescript-bot perf test this @typescript-bot test top100

Let's see if the tests are all ok, and then we're good to merge I think.

> We don't error on an abstract implementation member that omits `override`, the design meeting notes make it seem like it was brushed aside. @DanielRosenwasser can you link to the...

> [#44457 (comment)](https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/44457#issuecomment-856170640) Thanks, that makes a lot of sense. So why would we want to put `override` in the case brought up by this issue? Is it just to...

I've been investigating this issue, and at least for the example large jsons provided here (by @steve-ross and the json files in @ryancwalsh's `paintcolornerd`), it seems what is happening is...

@ryancwalsh do you mind providing a link to the 3MB json you mentioned was causing the slowdown?

For future reference, I also checked that this works for nested JSDoc param tags, like so: ```ts class E { /** * @private * @param {Object} [bar] * @param {Object}...

Here goes a sort of personal summary of the situation, based on my recent investigation of this issue. Let me first say that index signatures are a bit confusing and...

> @gabritto I mean, `foo3` is technically consistent under the current rules since `target[p]` is a _read_. The fact that you then go on to unsoundly mutate the object you...