g11tech
g11tech
seems to require approval from original authors
this PR as such seems correct as the `MAX_DEPOSITS` is being assigned in the compute fn itself, but may be authors want to use the import value and not the...
closing the PR as the EIP withdrawn as expressed by the author,
makes sense imo, @gballet you wanna look into this?
stagnant EIP, needs author to approve if they want to pursue this
stagnant EIP, will let authors take the call 1m1 ([@1m1-github](https://github.com/1m1-github))
this is not needed, EIP 7723 already describes this process and works on the top of EIP-1. the set of governance related EIPs could just be listed and browsed from...
cc: 1m1 (@1m1-github) @SamWilsn can we fix the to flag the author for an EIP asset changes as well
please do not mark comments rresolved without resolving them, case in point: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/9440#discussion_r2054387928
leaving to @SamWilsn for taking call on this PR