Franco Victorio

I am of the opinion that this kind of thing belongs in a linter (tagging @juanpcapurro, who is maintaining `solhint-community`). That being said, not everyone agrees with that point of...

> can u confirm if the error persists if some hardhat contract is deployed before the snapshot What do you mean? Before the first snapshot? Or before the first revert?

Same behavior if I do this: ```js await ethers.deployContract("Dummy"); const snapshotId = await network.provider.send("evm_snapshot") ``` If I do this instead, it works: ```js const snapshotId = await network.provider.send("evm_snapshot") await ethers.deployContract("Dummy");...

Hi @mbrubeck, are you still interested in this? I might give it a chance, although my haskell knowledge is extremely basic.

Just FYI, I ended up doing something different ([here's](https://github.com/fvictorio/completely) the repo if you are interested). The tl;dr is to have a intermediate representation of a completion system (in JSON in...

Hi, sorry for the bump, but I ran into this too and I can't think of a workaround. Is this a hard fix? Any way I could help?

> I can PR this to your code if its too much hassle. I can do it, no problem. But anyway you should be able to push to my branch...

I ended up removing just the `Token` of `Token.sol` and inlining that in `WethToken.sol`, and then I renamed `Token.sol` to `StandardToken.sol`. I did it that way just to avoid moving...

Oh, yeah, the output is ugly right now. It'll get better!

> 4 tests that cause assert to trigger are now returning invalid opcode and not revert opcode. Yes, I forgot to mention that! This changed but I think the previous...