Frank Sachsenheim
Frank Sachsenheim
@14rcole unfortunately the examples you posted vanished. could you please post them here, maybe as attachment if they are too big? i might be quick with a fix if you...
@nicolaiarocci shall we postpone this and bring on the releases?
@nicolaiarocci can you take on with the releases or can i help with preparations?
i'm removing the milestone here as long as there's no ample amount of data to reproduce.
ciao, thanks for contribution. am i grasping correctly that the addressed bug only occurs when a schema registry is used? is the custom coercer needed to reproduce the bug? did...
ciao @jsnjack, it's my lack of time. in particular reg. the `master` branch, b/c i have a lot of unpushed changes locally. anyway, yes, if you prepared am additional pr...
notes to self: the bug still exists in my local `annotated_handlers` branch, but the `_resolve_schema` method isn't available anymore.
> The new API would totally diverge from current one, making Cerberus 2 a different product. i wouldn't say that Cerberus would significantly differ by that change. the effort needed...
no, neither is decided yet whether such feature will be merged into master (but i'm still interested in implementing it as proof-of-concept), and certainly not soonish. input from your experience...
i'm adding the `2.0` milestone here while the inclusion of a proven implementation of the proposal remains undecided (but we have to decide before a `2.0` release).