Frank Sachsenheim
Frank Sachsenheim
i pledge to mark this for the `1.2` milestone.
solving this for one of the rules should solve it for all as the subvalidation dispatching is the same. @dkellner, if i'm not wrong you could be able to give...
> we're doing two full traversals now: one for normalization, and one for validation and i want to point out that the two traversals are different and that itches me...
> I'd argue the very nature of normalization and validation are different. If we're not doing a clear separation we will run in all kind of interesting bugs that is...
before i leave town for a while i'd like to share some thought i had when zooming out on this issue. i noticed a contradiction that hadn't been formulated yet:...
unless there are other proposals how to proceed with this issue, i'm going to remove the `1.3` milestone from this.
please use idiomatic Python and code highlighting with MarkDown. then i can have a look again.
i can't make sense to this without a minimal example of the context, the scheme used and the data validated.
i see, good examples. i guess i'd be the only one to take this. but i do not have much resources atm. i have two proposals: either you investigate whether...
i'm not certain whether and if so which milestone to set. @nicolaiarocci do we still maintain the 1.1 branch?