Paul Masurel
Paul Masurel
I took the liberty to remove the part about fuzzy search because it was off-topic. Thanks for the report. That's indeed super important.
Having a readonly feature flag is not necessarily a bad idea, but I don't think this should be the solution for this issue. As a simple work around for @Rigellute...
@Rigellute No fix is implemented at this point, but there will probably be something in the next version of tantivy. In the meanwhile, you can solve your problem in `tantivy-0.9`...
You code would look like something like that. (this is just a rough outtline don't expect the code below to compile as is. I am typing directly from github's editor)...
@Rigellute Good job. I suggest you also call `unreachable!` instead of delegating the writing operations. `atomic_write` and `open_write`. Does not matter muhc if you are confident your directory and files...
A read-only directory cannot be garbage collected no.
A simpler alternative would be to compile without jemalloc. It is an optional feature of quickwit.
Right now we have a readiness and a liveness probe. We also do not have any startup probe. The readiness probe relies on what is advertise on the cluster. The...
tagging as low priority
Yes. Let's keep that for later though. :)