Fabian Stäber

Awesome idea, thanks a lot. I am working on a new release that will be compatible with the module system. However, I didn't find the time to look into JFR...

Thanks a lot @dashpole. I didn't see that the "Metric Metadata" section answers some of these points, I just looked at the "Instrumentation Scope" section. Thanks for the pointer. >...

I added an item to tomorrow's [Prometheus Dev Summit](https://docs.google.com/document/d/11LC3wJcVk00l8w5P3oLQ-m3Y37iom6INAMEu2ZAGIIE/edit) agenda. If anyone's interested in joining, please do, everyone is welcome to participate and propose topics. Link to the calendar invite...

Awesome news from the Prometheus Dev Summit: The Prometheus team decided to implement support for OTel's instrumentation scope. See [Meeting Notes (2023-11-30)](https://docs.google.com/document/d/11LC3wJcVk00l8w5P3oLQ-m3Y37iom6INAMEu2ZAGIIE/edit#heading=h.k4a6xksjfl0z) for reference. **Background** The internal data model in...

Interesting, thanks for reporting. We recently had a performance issue with `s.charAt(i)` [here](https://github.com/prometheus/client_java/blob/ed0d7ae3b57a3986f6531d1a37db031a331227e6/simpleclient_common/src/main/java/io/prometheus/client/exporter/common/TextFormat.java#L157) which is fixed in [this commit on main](https://github.com/prometheus/client_java/blob/a76a65ddb62b50eb2c33a46e98cde4f4479a54a6/simpleclient_common/src/main/java/io/prometheus/client/exporter/common/TextFormat.java#L157-L157). I'm wondering whether that's the same issue. The reason...

Hey, thank you all for the detailed report. Just FYI: We are currently busy preparing the 1.0.0 release, which is due next week. However, `simpleclient_vertx4` will not be part of...

Thanks for the PR! I am currently on holidays with very limited access to the Internet, but I will get back to it next week.

I reviewed the changes and have a couple of questions to understand the code better: * Could you provide a few example log lines and a config file where all...

Thanks a lot for your response. I understand your usage scenario much better now. I really like the idea to be able to delete metrics. This should be a general...

I pushed a `delete_match` and `delete_labels` implementation. The new function `metric.ProcessDelete(line)` returns a map with the matching `delete_labels` and their values. I hope the return value of `metric.ProcessDelete(line)` is useful...