Israel Fruchter

this code isn't safe regardless of which version string it is. @avikivity can you share the version ? so whom would work fixing it can try it out ?

this specific issue was handled in f6e16274962c226067f21f5d94217652ba640dcf it was a mistake, and the code wasn't safe enough, assuming optional things always happen.

@xemul you still have issue with the email ?

@soyacz we should put failure email into email results file, if there's no other result

> > @soyacz we should put failure email into email results file, if there's no other result > > Also should also send email results for the first run -...

we now have email on failures, and when there no results we get emails as well. (not to mention one can track it in argus now, with almost all of...

> What's slow there? Is it the connection to the mirrors? probably, we'll keep tracking, to see if that wasn't something temporary

so far not seen this again

happened again for 2023.1 release, not clear what is the root cause of it ``` < t:2024-01-16 14:31:44,413 f:base.py l:228 c:RemoteLibSSH2CmdRunner p:DEBUG > CentOS Stream 8 - AppStream 80 kB/s...

First we probably need the ask for more Quota 2nd, we could try ignoring the conflict and continue, but it might back fire, since we had cases the duplication was...