Frode Tennebø
Frode Tennebø
This is a useful addition to --reverse which I'd welcome. I see no major issues with it. Please merge as is or with my suggestions.
Any news on this request, @vgough / @benrubson ?
It has been a while since I coded this together for a project and only recently managed to push it. I agree that there are some duplication in the code....
I tried pushing four changes to this fork to address your concern, but it looks like I ended up with a merge mess. Does the changes make sense or should...