Hans-Peter Jansen

Hey @cruelmelody, check out the [Get your feet wet](https://github.com/jgthms/bulma-start#get-your-feet-wet) section to see, if that clears things up sufficiently enough to get you started (again).

Guys, have a look at https://github.com/jgthms/bulma-start/pull/9/commits/3a97c5e47aef590baa8d12c7b4fa5ccb36d38b23 to see, if that clears things up.

Hi @benjaminapetersen, hi guys, I've moved the beginners notes to README.md, and slightly rephrased it [here](https://github.com/frispete/bulma-start). What do you think, does it fully addresses its purpose?

Hey guys, Jeremy merged the PR. @Albert-Gao in the hope, that this clears things up well enough, you might consider closing this issue.

Let me add, that the Blender 2.93.3 build fails with interesting errors (depending on the used compiler/ld), when using SYSTEM_GLEW. I've collected some related data here: https://devtalk.blender.org/t/building-blender-2-93-3-with-system-glew-fails/20090

This is an attempt to decouple the generated certificate filenames from the CN. If you try to run the example above without the patch, you will notice, that the CN...

@ecrist Thanks for caring. > That use case isn’t mentioned in your original pull request. Sorry. > Also, there is no documentation update to reflect this. Well, documentation [says](https://github.com/OpenVPN/easy-rsa/blob/v3.0.6/doc/EasyRSA-Advanced.md): ```...

Sorry @dpawson , didn't notice before... `PyCryptodome` and `PyCryptodomex` are equivalent, except they reside under a different namespace. In order to act as a drop-in replacement for `PyCrypto`, `PyCryptodome` installs...

> While the [package metadata specification](https://packaging.python.org/specifications/core-metadata/#rarely-used-fields) documents fields for that purpose, they are currently ignored by pip, if I'm not mistaken (see [pypa/pip#4625](https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/4625)). Nonetheless I think those fields should be...

> While the [package metadata specification](https://packaging.python.org/specifications/core-metadata/#rarely-used-fields) documents fields for that purpose, they are currently ignored by pip, if I'm not mistaken (see [pypa/pip#4625](https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/4625)). Nonetheless I think those fields should be...