freol35241

@bilke FYI, for use with [CPM](https://github.com/cpm-cmake/CPM.cmake), I ended up doing the following (bypassing this repo since I **only need header-only parts of boost** anyway and to be able to update...

@TheLartians Thanks for pointing me to the discussion, wasn't aware of that one! Feel free to close this issue if you consider it superfluous.

Hmm, good questions: * Since there is one exception handler associated with each node, each exception handler only deals with exceptions caused by "its own" node, nothing further downstream. On...

Thanks for taking a look 👍 Yes, my opinion is that a fully generic and integrated mechanism for exception handling probably needs to be present in all nodes. With that...

@martindurant I have been thinking a bit about this and the reason for me to put together the initial implementation in this PR was to try to get rid of...

@chrberger Updated this PR with similar corresponding changes in `UDPSender` and `OD4Session`. I am a bit unsure whether I managed to put all the ifdef blocks for the different OS:s...

Groundwork laid in #29. Further testing needed, especially with the interface towards HASS.

@Yamakaky Very interesting, thanks for reporting back! Can you please clarify: > I'm still experimenting with indexes on device_class, entity_id and device_class. Not that compressed chunks are only indexed on...

@FireEmerald Thanks for opening this issue, you bring up an interesting point here and I think I agree with you. Currently, there is some logic in the component setup that...

Thanks for an interesting idea. Still trying to grasp the pros/cons/possibilities with this. Some questions that have popped up: * How do you mean with "easier to manage"? The specific...