Fred Larsen

In the simplistic start/stop packet example, `"START_PACKET STOP_PACKET"`, I did include both receiver and sender PJON ids, which would allow the process to decide its own id, or even act...

In the discussed strategy there would be one pipe in each direction between two processes, and such mixing of messages will not be possible unless letting multiple threads write from...

@drtrigon The PJONAny constructor takes the device id of that bus as a second parameter. The default device id is PJON_NOT_ASSIGNED, making the switch "invisible" on that bus. You can...

Hello, hope I am not intruding, but I have some relevant experience. As I see it the two most tempting alternatives are: 1. Using a SoftwareBitBang surrogate with the EthernetTCP...

Regarding Ethernet shield, I have standardized on using these red ones, and I have tested them on Nano, Uno and Mega, and they have been running continuously for at least...

@drtrigon I trust in wires, so I prefer to use wired Ethernet wherever possible. But I agree that a WiFi to SWBB switch would be a nice thing for special...

I was thinking of the WINDOWS_LINUX_LUDP example, yes. Then on Arduino the WebPage/ARDUINO_SWBB/SensorMonitor and WebPage/ARDUINO_SWBB/LightController. And the switch from the PJON example ARDUINO/Local/SoftwareBitBang/Tunneler/BlinkingRGBSwitch, connecting the LUDP and SWBB buses. I...

@drtrigon Regarding the Surrogate vs Switch, the Switch is kind of a general routing device, while the Surrogate was something I came up with to exploit a special mode of...

@drtrigon Regarding the difference between Surrogate and Switch, the Surrogate is really only intended for one-to-one strategies like the ETCP variant (that only requires Ethernet firewall port opening/forwarding in one...

Well, this must be a record in delayed response, I did not see any email notifications at the time. I changed to a priority email account now to avoid this...