forrestsmithfb

+1 for requesting this feature

@ryanfleury, how would you feel about `.raddbg` files containing (optionally encrypted?) source code? SymbolServer + SourceIndexing is genuinely magical. Being able to attach a debugger and automagically get both symbols...

I'm delighted you agree. I wasn't sure if that idea would be considered a good one or not. > it makes more sense if/when compilers/linkers actually generate RADDBG files directly....

> Certainly for remote debugging you need something like this, but for the current local stuff, this seems like it's better done in a script...? I think it makes sense...

It goes through the whole loop to determine roffset, doesn't find the magic value 0x68636952, and returns 0. https://github.com/milostosic/rdebug/blob/master/src/symbols.cpp#L84 Here's the values it did read: 0x0eba1f0e 0xcd09b400 0x4c01b821 0x685421cd 0x70207369...

I just learned about `symchk`. ``` symchk.exe PATH/to/Foo.exe /s srv*MYSERVERPATH ``` Symchk is succeeding. And it fails if I do not specify the symbol server. I have no idea why...

Yeah. Microsoft symbol server libraries are all single threaded and crazy inefficient/slow. It's super frustrating and annoying.