Florian Mayer

I should add a concrete reason for the above situation! In my current project, I have to deal with a rather large and complex class hierarchy resembling ASTs for the...

The error also occurs when I build with flag `-O0` and with `--std=c++1z`. Furthermore, if I change the order of the `Case(C(lOp))` and `Case(C(aOp))` blocks, the semantics does not change....

Thank you for the fix and the very good links providing background information!

> functional programs, can you elaborate on why you need this many? Yes, of course. I'm writing this VHDL frontend for my graduation. Because of the lack of time, I...

My motivation for the excessive binding declaration from [traverse_all.cc](https://github.com/forflo/yodl/blob/master/vhdlpp/traverse_all.cc#L68) simply was improved code clarity.

By writing, > But as I already had to make all members public, I can as well just use the normal member access operator on the ScopeBase object. I meant...

> have to tell me how many arguments would be sufficient for your use cases. I already resolved it using normal member access, but thank you very much for the...

First of all, thank you for your comment on this! > One of the big contributions of Mach7 was not just the concise syntax, but also a very efficient type...

I'm currently travelling, but if I continue this project, I'll have to rewrite yodl anyways. So licensing issues won't be existent in the future.

Maybe that's too simple, but for C/C++ you could just use null pointers. At least that's the approach IcarusVerilog's vhdlpp uses. Vhdlpp is a VHDL to Verilog transpiler which I'm...