Jonathan Müller

> Yet concepts work just fine. If they worked fine, you would have a name for them... > here is an example why it is superior to do things this...

Ah, I didn't realize what exactly you've done in the chrono example, my apoligies. Let me elaborate. In the current status of units, we have a `quantity` class template and...

> Here is my preference order for Quantity --> > > 1. in_quantity -> " in the set of quantity " . concepts are easy to identify by the prefix,...

What are the Doxygen semantics for grouping? Because my group is more like Doxygen's @{, i.e. one doc for multiple entities.

I also have `\module` but an entity can only be in one module.

I'm not sure putting an entity in multiple modules is useful, if you can convince me, I'll do it. Regarding compatibility: I'll never be fully compatible with Doxygen but I...

I welcome any PRs to cppast.

Not yet, will do something like that.

Compatibility with Doxygen is no concern. I haven't thought about a shorthand syntax, is a great idea. But not for \requires because it will also be used for preconditions so...

Thanks for the info.