Fran Méndez
Fran Méndez
> Making a property required @jonaslagoni making a property required is also a breaking change. If I use an AsyncAPI 2.2.0 document as the input for an AsyncAPI 2.3.0 tool,...
I think the binding spec should explicitly state the minimum and maximum version of the core spec it supports. Just [like we do with Generator templates](https://github.com/asyncapi/html-template/blob/master/package.json#L106) but not necessarily in...
/progress 60 New `operations` object is defined but there's still a pending discussion about how to reference the channel, i.e., via ID or `$ref` object. Read more on [#663](https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/issues/663).
/progress 60 > did it work :trollface:? or did you make sure that only your "progress comments" are taken into account? 😄 It did work because it's meant to be...
Alright, I think I addressed all the points @derberg. Would you please review it again?
> just to be clear, after we merge it, a release candidate will be released and published on the website 🤔 Should we avoid it for now? I just want...
> We could add some big note at the beginning of the spec file, with some essential links on how to engage in works towards 3.0, just a thought. That's...
@derberg done. Let me know what you think.
Shall we close this PR then?
Interesting. I think you may also be interested in #618. It makes the channel Id mandatory.