Fran Méndez
Fran Méndez
Added #599 to the issue description.
Added a new proposal to the issue description: #618
While working on 3.0.0, we'll find a bunch of things that are not BC and could potentially be added to 2.x. However, IMHO, we must be careful not to _overimprove_...
Yeah, that's a bit unfortunate but the reason we did that is that we had to choose between [JSON Merge Patch](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7386) or [JSON Patch](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902), which will suit this use case...
> I'd propose to clearly state this behavior (and it's consequences) in the specification and rethink how we want to do information merging / inheritance in the next major version...
Yeah, the CloudEvents example is a good one. We're making some great progress with the publish/subscribe issue that will be fixed in version 3.0.0. I think we should aim for...
Answering your comment in the #775 issue: > I've issued a https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/pull/776 that remedies the situation and would probably suggest to go for 2.4.1 as soon as possible. Yeah, I...
Done. Weird, supposedly, just leaving a comment here should remove the stale label 🤔 Or maybe I dreamed it 😄
Yup. Thanks for noticing, @smarek.