Floris Lambrechts

Yes, that looks good. But it needs a unit test as well.

I think this makes sense. Where did you find out about `{#}`? I was not familiar with that.

We should document this in the README too. What keywords do we use for space and tab? Simply `{space}` and `{tab}`?

TOML support is discussed in #42. But I think _this_ approach is simpler, and thus could end up being release sooner too.

How would your preferred config file look, with the new feature added? If I understand correctly, you'd want to bump `release` from `rc` to `ignore`, bit if it's already `ignore`,...

I think this makes sense... We can consider it for the next release.

Agreed that it should not be printed if tagging is disabled.

Bug or feature, I don't know... But we can't change it because it would break the workflow of some people. Let's make this a feature request. Can you explain in...

There is no commit between `0.5.10` and `0.5.11` which explicitly removes this behavior. Also, the unit test covering `--dry-run --verbose` output, was only added in 4e700bc43070349a4f0cf9f05811b313471436ad (`v1.0.1`). So we have...

Yes you are right. What I meant to say was -- there is no commit which _intentionally_ removed that behavior. So I think it got removed by accident.