Florian Hartig

yes, right, I had the feeling that there was something going on there - so this is https://github.com/florianhartig/BayesianTools/issues/118

I'm trying to finalize 0.1.5 now and we should do this for 0.1.6

Hi, can I ask: what's the purpose of this, i.e. why don't you know how many parameters you have? BT generally assumes you know how many parameters your model has....

Hi Gary, thanks for the explanation - lots of topics. I try to respond point by point 1. The original question: personally, I would not throw out parameters unless you...

1. looic - OK, I see, this is like the typical frequentist lasso cross-validation. From what I read, this is unusual for a Bayesian analysis, where the penalty would usually...

At the moment (version 0.1.7), BT doesn't explicitly support discrete or binary parameters. If this is only about a small number of parameters, you could probably emulate a discrete parameter...

It would be easy to fix this, simply adding multiplying mcmcOutput$settings$thin to start / end / thin values in the return of getSample. However, then the question is - if...

Max, Tankred, opinions?

I don't think an own object, or moving away from coda, is really an option, as a lot of coda objects are used internally. We had a https://github.com/florianhartig/BayesianTools/issues/5 a while...

I had to revert https://github.com/florianhartig/BayesianTools/commit/51a2ee0c334cf016bbc612493a328e8f4f219754, check in the future what the exact problem was and correct