Nikita Shilnikov

Hard to tell, I wouldn't hope for it TBH. Problem is we don't have a proper abstraction for schemas (PG, Oracle)/databases (MySQL) in rom-sql itself, making all our attempts to...

I wouldn't say it's a bug because `filter_type_ids` is a fallback identifier from Sequel rather than a ROM attribute. You should use `where { self[:filter_type_ids].is(...) | ... }`

@wuarmin sorry for the confusion, I think the truth is in the middle: there's `in`, there's no `any` in rom-sql API, that's why it falls back to Sequel. You should...

> which is invalid and not what I need, I need I'm just saying it should have no difference at the database level. You can use inline SQL with backticks:...

I think we can drop ruby 2.x safely

Seems like a good enough workaround to me

Could you please post sample code for reproducing it?

Discovered in #450

Dunno but this one should be closed for lack of info 😅

I like the idea but haven't looked into the implementation yet. However, I think `