Flander

*First, thank you for this swift response!* I'm proposing to add **if** and **for** statements to the **function** rule. It makes code more regular about empty lines. I do agree...

Currently **gofmt** already removes empty lines around `struct` and `interface` declarations. So I guess we can read it as: > No empty lines around struct declarations > No empty lines...

I totally agree @davidmdm

@cristaloleg I used a very simple example just to show what I intended. I tested if and yes, if you have only one instruction inside the `if` statement it indeed...

ive been using this pr for a while on some projects and it indeed works. =) Thanks @davidmdm

@davidmdm hi! have you seen what @mvdan said about this pr on issue #284? I'm not sure if you should do it or me ._.

> Also, personally, I prefer the current behaviour where all blocks are pruned of newlines. I see, and I agree with you about the rule. But nonetheless it is a...

Can confirm this also happens with `something?.something` syntax. The `?` causes the next token to be unexpected