Max Horn
Max Horn
The code in this repository is hopelessly outdated, don't use it!
Use this instead: https://github.com/glandium/git-cinnabar
gitifyhg isn't really supported anymore. Perhaps try my fork of git-remote-hg at https://github.com/fingolfin/git-remote-hg/
(That said, I have never tested on 10.11, and so I don't know if git-remote-hg will work there, but if you report a bug for _that_, I'll look into it)
Yeah, you need a newer version of git. Hence the error message contains this: "This remote helper probably needs newer version of Git."
Git does not at all care whether branches are "placed directly under heads". The reason why it works in your code is that my test code above uses the local...
Note that using the `push` remote-helper commands instead of `export` could be used to avoid this, as push gets told both the remote and the local ref. But of course...
Yesterday I wasted three quarters of an hour to resolve the mess caused by how branch names are handled and translated, and things were made seriously worse by the fact...
Yeah, I do and did realize that no heuristic can possible catch the general case, although for me the branches usual interact in a very trivial way, so a heuristic...
No it doesn't; but perhaps the article series they announce will. See also [our mailing list](https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gitifyhg/W8IkoaEzLq0/3jytJ3FvCdYJ) For now I remain sceptical... especially about Joel Spolsky's claim that [Everything maps. Everything...