Filip Hrisafov
Filip Hrisafov
Everything works out-of-the box with fluent setters. There are no fluent getters actually. As fluent implies that you get the same object back and for getters you get something else.
@debug-desperado `CustomAccessorNamingStrategy` is within the tests. In any case even if that is done it won't have the effect that you explained. As I said in https://github.com/mapstruct/mapstruct/issues/1601#issuecomment-421446125. This one is...
@thmasker the `ImmutablesAccessorNamingStrategy` is the custom accessor naming strategy for the Immutables library. That would be the right place to add support for fluent setters for Immutable files
Thanks @Gavriil-Tzortzakis, I hope I'll be able to find some time soon to review this one.
Thanks for the detailed issues @xenoterracide. Let me explain why certain things do not work: >1. multiple uses, still only results in a single injection being done This is by...
>Is there an issue for supporting fluent getters? The problem with fluent getter is that there is no way of knowing which method is a getter and which isn't. A...
>I'm moving the fluent conversation over to the other ticket but for this in particular I'm 90% certain... With the other 10% completely doubting myself 😉. when it comes to...
Have you tried with 1.6.0.Beta2?
Seems like we are not passing the bean mapping to the generated sub class mappings. We should do that. Thanks for the detailed report @pemu69
Yes sure @Obolrom. I'll assign it to you. If you have some questions, feel free to reach out.