Fernando Macedo

Hi @Gabronog, thanks for this improvement.

Hi @pliniocsfernandes, thanks for your time and effort on doing this enhancement. Can you consider to write a few tests to cover this feature?

Hi @fkromer , thanks for pointing out this requirement. At this point, I think that hierarchical/nested state machines are not supported. I've never tried. So any complete example should be...

Hi @claverru, thanks for your contribution. Feel free to elaborate a complete example and I'll be happy to publish on the docs. We've a lot of implemented features that are...

It would be nice! But I don't like the idea of adding a required dependency for this. Maybe this should be in a contrib module. This way, what do you...

Thanks for pointing out this idea @caiolopes . Thanks for your snippet @claverru ! Let me share what I'm thinking about. I'm reading about [`statecharts`](https://statecharts.github.io/) since SCXML (Statechart XML), is...

@YPCrumble thanks for your question. Currently there's no built-in support for [parallel states as described by scxml](https://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#parallel). I think that supporting this will be a nice improvement. That being said,...

@brunolnetto I'm planning to at least resolve the issue https://github.com/fgmacedo/python-statemachine/issues/243 before Python2 EOL. So we'll leave a more complete Python2 version.

Hi @arseniy-panfilov, thanks for pointing this issue. Currently, validators have the same api as the transition callback, except for not accepting the statemachine as the first param. They should raise...

Hi @arseniy-panfilov , nice snippet! It really shows that something is missing. We can't keep up with this `validators` API. Let me share what I'm thinking about. I'm reading about...