Flavio Finger

similar issue, different package: https://github.com/epiforecasts/EpiNow/issues/74 related: https://github.com/reconhub/incidence/issues/93 https://github.com/reconhub/incidence/issues/28 https://github.com/reconhub/incidence/pull/94

yes, if there is overdispersion quasipoisson or negative binomial regression would be best.

It looks like other packages have found a way to use separate windows: https://github.com/atom-community/markdown-preview-plus/pull/385 https://github.com/atom-community/markdown-preview-plus/issues/36 Could the same thing be done for hydrogen output and hydrogen inspector panes?

I think it would already be a step forward if the warning could say which column is concerned. If guess_dates is called by clean_data you don't necessarily know which part...

yes, I do agree. On the other hand I think it is quite important that the seed is not the same (1...N) in every calibration run. How about seeding the...

> I would like to keep the function signature of postfn as simple as possible. One has the option to perturb numpy's seed using the passed theta values or time....

I do not have experience with this, but the _inspect_ module might be an option. You can get the number of arguments a function takes as well as the names...

right. maybe use a parameter that can be True or False when you setup the sampler object? it can be False by default, so no random state object is given...

I just implemented what I wrote in my last comment. Up to you if you like it and want to include it in your version. For my application it is...

Because I am using it to calibrate a stochastic model (that means I make extensive use of random numbers in the model) and I would like to be able to...