ffaf1

Results 160 comments of ffaf1

I will leave the decision to Hackage admins. It not as trivial as “UTF-8”, see [RFC 9839](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9839.html), plus I guess OS oddities.

I agree with most suggestions. But most importantly I _strongly_ agree with a UX revamp for `cabal init`. As now the user has to enter input _fourteen times_ to finally...

We don't have yet source positions, but pointing to the file and component should be doable.

Gershom (on Matrix) confirms that this should not impact Hackage. He points to x-fields as an option, but I understand this might not palatable to MicroHs developers.

What if we were to attach a `cabal-install` pre-release? Or is that out of the question?

This is not good, as Hackage will eventually use what `Cabal` say.

What is `cabal sdist` supposed to do? Pack all of those files or conditionally exclude some?

Does this need backport? I think so, since it influences Hackage behaviour.

@mergify backport 3.16

Got bitten by this one too, would be nice to see this merged. @ndmitchell do you need a helping hand in low-level maintainership tasks (triaging issues, merging non-controversial patches, etc.)?