Fabrizio

I haven't forgot about this, i will get back to this soon/ Apologise for the delay

@lopezator Hi, I will have a look at this, but it sounds like some sort of limitation of `protobuf.js` parser. I'll let you know once i've got some more information

@glerchundi i haven't look this yet, i'm fairy busy at the moment, but i'll get to this asap

Unfortunately this is a limitation of protobufjs parser, you can read more information here. https://github.com/uw-labs/bloomrpc/issues/115 I'll try to make it work in a different way in future releases if the...

@leaxoy interesting idea! I will eventually get there but we have more important feature to implement at the moment. But surely it will be a great addition

Hi @VivekRagunathan thanks for the feature request it looks very handy from the sound of it. Could give me an example on how you'd like to define and use those...

Hi @VivekRagunathan thanks for the example! I think this is a kind of evolution of https://github.com/uw-labs/bloomrpc/issues/6 which will allow the editor to use variables within the request. Since we are...

@shaneqld Hi there! I'm not sure i follow, the `google.protobuf.Timestamp` message type has got 2 fields, which represent the date, you can see it here: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/master/src/google/protobuf/timestamp.proto#L127 That's why bloomrpc tries...

@shaneqld this feature is coming soon

hi, @paulooosrj Yes! this is a lovely request and we are keen to implement it in the editor. I can't give you any timeline for this but surely is something...