Dr. Felix Riese

Thanks! Since alphapept is an pre-alpha version, these kinds of changes are totally expected 👍

Just for the documentation: column names of the peptide table seem to have changed in AlphaPept [`0.4.6`](https://github.com/MannLabs/alphapept/releases/tag/v0.4.6): * Removed `"ms1_int_sum_dn"` * Changed `"ms1_int_sum"` to `"ms1_int_sum_apex"`

How do you come up with this assumption? It works for me with `redis`.

The SOM is designed to take `M` input vectors with `N` dimensions, so the data should have a shape of `(M, N)`. Yours is image data with a shape of...

Glad to hear that it works! For the interpretation of the results: what exactly do you want to achieve with the SOM? What do you want to visualize? See [examples/SOMClustering.ipynb](https://github.com/felixriese/susi/blob/main/examples/SOMClustering.ipynb)...

I have the same issue. It seems like this could have been resolved by #1162 and is just not released yet (fix from November '21, release from July '21). Did...

Update: With `1.0.0`, I am pretty sure this worked for me: ```yaml flower: image: mher/flower:1.2.0 command: celery flower ports: - 5000:5000 environment: - CELERY_TIMEZONE=Europe/Berlin - CELERY_ENABLE_UTC=True - TZ=Europe/Berlin ``` Now...

Now, version `1.2.0` is available: https://hub.docker.com/r/mher/flower/tags

Is it fixed with your merged PR #1162 ?

Thanks for the explanations! Is there an easy way to test if the prioritization works? Two first steps would be: * Can I somewhere list the queue names (`celery`, `celery1`,...