felix

On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 07:36:12AM -0700, jrmarsha wrote: > @felix-salfelder What is your status on this? tried to follow your instructions (rebase etc.). thought it worked. (short on...

On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 01:53:14PM -0800, jrmarsha wrote: > It really is just rebasing on boostorg/develop . rebased to f7dfafb5af0ca. was it the right one? thanks!

On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 01:58:39PM -0800, jrmarsha wrote: > use the `devel` tag, not a hash. all tags i can see are of the form [..] boost-1.65.0 boost-1.65.1...

On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 02:05:12PM -0800, jrmarsha wrote: > Well that's isn't right. I'll need you to walk me through how to > re-create your setup. How are...

Paramset evaluation and pruning is (partly) implemented in modelgen [1]. It speeds up both compilation and execution significantly, as expected. Unlike OpenVAF, modelgen uses Verilog-AMS semantics internally and is able...

How about the converse? Say, I implement a (proprietary) model, then compile it with OpenVAF with the intent to distribute the output binary. Assuming that the blob contains bits and...

We now have an initial laplace_nd filter in the recent modelgen snapshot [1]. The implementation might give some ideas, in case anyone would like to add it to OpenVAF. [1]...