Fede Fernández
Fede Fernández
I think that the problem is that the array is not covered by the pattern matcher. IMHO this question is not related with the issue or even macroid, it seems...
Hi, have you considered to publish the artifacts to oss.sonatype in order to have it available in maven central? this would avoid the extra resolvers.
@L-Lavigne this looks good to me. This is an idea that we've been thinking about since some time ago. Thanks for trying to address it. As a side note, I...
@rafaparadela instead of adding new configuration params or extra complexity to our http definitions I suggest re-using the http4s types. Let me explain it with an example. Suppose you have...
I didn't know you were working on this actively, sorry for not raising this before. As you said, keeping things with the http4s gives us more flexibility and at the...
@SemanticBeeng that sounds reasonable to me. `mu` has support for http but is not documented yet. The support was added here: * https://github.com/higherkindness/mu/pull/552 What you're proposing is totally feasible. In...
@noelmarkham @L-Lavigne I agree, the implicits approach won't work. I'm looking forward to see the approach with default values and how they look with the macro.
@juanpedromoreno this is done, right?
Good catch @YarekTyshchenko, we have two different operations for Issues and PRs. I'm wondering what will be the right behavior here. I guess the easy one is just to make...
@abteilung6, thanks for the suggestions. I can help you with the missing pieces if you want to create the PR. It would be nice to give you the proper credits...