feature-engineer

Why support forward at all? I thought `auto in`, `auto inout` and `auto out` were there to let us forget about `&`, `&&`, `const` etc. It should just do the...

> Same reason it exists in C++, so you don't have to write the same function twice (for each forwarded parameter). I may be missing something. `copy` already automatically deduces...

> `copy` doesn't deduce anything. It's just pass-by-value. Not according to the talk Herb gave. When there's a definite last use of a variable, it's passed as r-value as a...

> That's not argument deduction, that's just changing the value category of an argument. So by argument deduction you also mean deducing constness and whether it's a ref or a...

@joelspadin The proprietary protocol is already utilized by games (and is also used by Roccat, not just Alienware). While an open standard would be great, it would only work if...

Hmm... On second thought, we could just create a lightfx.dll with the same function entries, and make it implement whatever protocol we would like. Unless I'm missing something. There's https://github.com/Archomeda/lightfx-extender/tree/master...

In case of classification, the uploaded data must be symmetric about the center of the distribution for the training to work well, since the loss function is MSE. MSE -...

@marioarbras > The same is true if we create a string literal and immediately need to navigate it, without passing it to a function. Have you ever seen anyone do...

compile-time code execution is great, what I have doubts about is the need for compile-time string literal slicing. If you've got several parts of interest in a single string literal...

> This is an implementation-defined trick, but what you can do is pass __PRETTY_FUNC__/__FUNCSIG__ as a non-type template parameter Does this trick require the use of pointer arithmetic? If so,...