Fabio Caccamo

@StevenMapes I'm aware of this limitation, unfortunately at the moment I have not the time for working on it. I created this discussion #83.

@InzGIBA - I agree with the possibility to define layers priority - Reading from env variables could give some problems with types because all values would be strings, any idea?!

@InzGIBA I'm not convinced about this approach, I would like to keep it very simple as it is now, I will think about this...

Please, just explain me why you need this.

Actually I'm not using `django-freeze` in any project. This lib would need a test suite to support new django versions with backward compatibility, but I've not time do write tests,...

@stanim I have this feature in mind since long time, but actually I have not time to implement it, so I share with you my idea in case you want...

I understand your needs, but it seems a specific case. The maintenance state file is not for this, you should write a custom state backend that return values based on...

@stanim check #66 if you are interested to implement a quick schedule system by @scwall using the backend/database, or check #48 if you need to control maintenance mode state using...

@TimurKhan thank you for reporting your experience with this library. The ordering problem was really hard to solve because the objective was to sort an N levels data structure which...

This doesn't seem to be more a more transparent solution :) Anyway, before the current implementation, I stored the ordering string in a db field, but it could become very...