Jonathan Fraine

Because this formula is simple to code up: where do we include it in the code? I am sure that I could work out the longitudes and latitudes to integrate...

> @exowanderer Is the double sigmoid equal to the longitudinally integrated intensity, or to a radial slice across the surface of the planet? If it's the former, we need to...

> @exowanderer Hmmm. I don't think so, since it sounds like you want the code to output a _function_ (i.e., `sqrt(3) / pi * x ** 2`) rather than a...

Hello @rodluger, thank you for the core mathematics work and the Jupyter notebook to play with it. This is very much in line with my hopes for such a project....

Related question: how did you derive these equations? I would be interested to try several models in a similar pattern without bothering you; such as the 5 parameter model. I...

Excellent. I didn't see that parameter! I tried this out, keeping `planet.Omega = 90`; but varying `planet.w` between [0,90,180,270]. The eclipse location definitely varies with respect to eccentricity and omega;...

Because the transit center is changing with `planet.w`, is it possible that the `observer` is being rotated around the star, instead of the planetary orbit? [@kevin218 and I had to...

That makes sense. Also, this is the third time that the answer was "well, [Jonathan's] interpretation is at fault". Thank you for your help. Would it be sufficient to marginalize...

I assume that you are offering to develop the `get_t0` as a means to translate from `lambda0` and `tref` into `transit_time` by solving Kepler's equations; but I wonder if this...

PR #13 fixes this issue. And TRAVIS says that there are no conflicts with the repo. Is @openai trying to keep this compatible with older versions of Keras? If so,...