Christian Hesse
Christian Hesse
Yes, I applied it downstream: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/systemd/-/commit/e64d3b887242eebe9cd25223b6d68ae0a4f4bc0c No issues for myself, and nothing has been reported. But as said: We have lvm 2.03.24, I can not tell what happens in combination...
You could create a pull request for this to speed up things...
Then let's wait of upstream to respond, and I will keep the downstream package as is.
Can we merge this? I would like to just cherry-pick this into out package instead of handling patches. Thanks!
BTW, this contains a merge commit now... Anybody should press the rebase button.
Release happened just yesterday... Guess this can be closed now.
Indeed, specifying the interface with `--interface=wl` gives the expected result. Well, actually the missing part of the expected result. Anyway, would be nice to have the complete result set, without...
Sure, here we go. There are the `resolvectl` commands and their output: ``` eworm@leda ~ % resolvectl query --legend=false --protocol=mdns --type=PTR --synthesize=false --zone=false --interface=bridge '_pacserve._tcp.local' _pacserve._tcp.local IN PTR pacserve\032on\032nepu-08-00-27-0c-71-63._pacserve._tcp.local --...
Oh, another but related one... Querying for a mDNS service *the first time* returns only *one* result. All/several services are listed only in subsequent queries. Is that expected? Can we...
Hmm, this is to recover a system or what is your intention? Just citing from documenting: > Be warned: Do not remove or overwrite your interactive (regular) key! Keep that...