Dave Evans

> Git log is your best bet. No worries. If it was just Python 2 support that caused the major version bump then that shouldn't affect us at all. >...

This sounds like an incompatibility between the versions of Django and pytest-django being used and nothing specific to whitenoise.

Hi @foobacca, these are only used in the JSON methods so the original XML API should still be Python 2.6 compatible. We (I work with @tow, the original author) added...

Hi Tom, thanks for raising this. Yes, I'd definitely be interested in supporting native ASGI in WhiteNoise. My hope is that it won't actually involve a lot of extra code....

Yes, absolutely. It's "just" a case of finding the time.

Yes, that's exactly how it works. I agree an overview like this would be a nice to thing to have in the docs. If I ever get time I'll add...

> whitenoise treats it as "gzip by preference" (because it's earlier in the list) I'm pretty sure that's not true. It prefers the smallest response size: https://github.com/evansd/whitenoise/blob/main/src/whitenoise/responders.py#L194

Hi, sorry this has gone unreviewed for so long. Just snowed under with other things at the moment. I am going to try to take a look at this as...

Thanks, yes, I'd definitely welcome a PR which made things more deterministic. (Assuming it didn't add loads of complexity, which I can't imagine it would.) I already hit one issue...

Is this issue specific to Whitenoise or do you get the same behaviour with Django's [ManifestStaticFilesStorage](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/ref/contrib/staticfiles/#manifeststaticfilesstorage)?