Ethan Roseman comments

Results 165 comments of


                                            Ethan Roseman

Use Intel syntax instead of ATT for x86

no obligation for either of you to do this, btw. just tagging since you had previously looked at it

Use Intel syntax instead of ATT for x86

Oh, huh. We were planning on not supporting both. Is there a reason you want to support it specifically? I'm guessing it'd be okay to support both, but @simonlindholm seemed...

Use Intel syntax instead of ATT for x86

Gotcha, that makes sense. If you are open to helping, that'd be great, as this currently blocks a decomp.me pr or two :) but no pressure. I'd help but I...

Use Intel syntax instead of ATT for x86

https://github.com/simonlindholm/asm-differ/compare/main...EstexNT:asm-differ:i686-intel

Permute improvements

expanded version of #32

Use c shape files

this PR adds over 2 minutes to the total build time, so I'd really prefer keeping this an option still

Use c shape files

or I guess it's less bad if ccache works

Lowercase TRUE and FALSE, rename b32 to bool

What's the idea here? I'm not sure porting just lowercase true/false to old gcc is worth it. If we really wanted lowercase t/f we could just make macros for them,...

Sprite animation format improvements

they are in my new PR

Recipes asset

we can use ExtraDoubleRecipes for this too